Jack'o Lanterns

We did make a pie, but never took a photo. Trust me, it was good.

And now, a year later, as we PURCHASE pumpkins for Halloween in our new home in Pittsburgh (dreaming of a garden next year, perhaps), I finally get around to posting last year's carved pumpkins.



Yes, they had a baby....don't ask, and we won't tell.

The Ripening

Sounds like a Stephen King novel.

But in fact, just wanted to update you all on the pumpkin progress, with photos.

First, the very sad state of "Non":




Ah, that too too mortal flesh....

And then, to give you cheer (all photos from 24 September 2006):




Now, we just have to hope they make it to Halloween....(the pumpkins, I mean, not the sisters)

The "Death" of "Non"

Sad news for milk-fed pumpkin fans: last week, when we went to measure, we discovered that "Non" had rolled off the cardboard box it was propped on to keep it from getting moldy on the bottom, and, smashed by its own (as yet unmeasured) weight, developed a very nasty area of white mold and slime on its underside. Needless to say, "Non" is not growing anymore, and we have one less jack-o-lantern for Halloween.

But that's okay, because we really only need two. And the experiment seems to have found its natural end: the growth of "A" and "L" has also leveled off, as a quick look at the charts reveals:






Given that by far "Non" had the fastest rate of growth up until its untimely demise, I think we can say pretty conclusively that milk-feeding (sugar-water feeding, for you sticklers) a pumpkin through a slit in the vine doesn't help, and might even hurt. In fact, we saw no evidence that any of the liquid in the containers made its way out of the containers and into the pumpkin--even the "real" candlewicks stayed bone dry, and the containers are as full as they ever were.

My theory? Almanzo had a very happy cat that year, who found a nice bowl of milk out at the pumpkin patch every morning.

So far, "A" and "L" remain undamaged, and have even begun to turn orange. No pictures yet, for the usual reason (yes, we'll be getting a digital camera soon!!).

At some point in November, I hope to be posting photos of pie...

(Scroll down through the earlier posts to see pictures of the pumpkins at earlier stages of the experiment).

Data Set #2

September 9, 2006

First, some non-scientific journaling. I seemed to have scored some brownie points with Big Sister's second grade teacher when I mentioned, in conference, that Big Sis had wanted to grow a milk-fed pumpkin after reading about it in a book. "Now there's a terrific text-to-self connection," Ms. B commented. Too bad Big Sister stubbornly refuses to do same in daily homework...

And when we went to measure the pumpkins today, Little Sister was delighted to find that her name had magically appeared in the pumpkin's skin, along with a heart.

Today's numbers:

"A" is now at 25" L/ 50" D
"L" is now at 18" L/ 37" D
Non is now at 24" L/ 48" D

Pumpkin "A" on 9/9/2006 (note sour cream container & wick):








Pumpkin "L" on 9/9/2006:






Other observations: there are "splits" in the bottoms of both "L" and "Non", perhaps a sign that both are growing TOO quickly? I'm beginning to fear that we may not have jack o' lanterns this year.

Here are charts of the growth to date:






We notice this week that the "wicks" seem to be dry; in addition, contrary to what Farmer Boy claimed, the pumpkin is not sucking up a bowl of milk (sugar water) per day. In fact, the containers are as full as they were last week. Manley didn't have plastic sour cream containers with tight-fitting lids; I'm beginning to suspect that his milk evaporated.

Or: our method is wrong (we have, after all, introduced a number of new variables into the original schema).

Why is the non milk-fed pumpkin growing faster than the milk fed ones?

Hypothesis 1: it's on a healthier vine. (who can tell? they're all tangled up!)

Hypothesis 2: cutting slits into the vine causes stress to the developing fruit.

Hypothesis 3: "A" was already so big when we started that it wasn't going to get much bigger anyway. "L" seems to be speeding up its rate of growth, might have grown faster/bigger if it didn't have a slit in its vine.

Hypothesis 4: the wicks aren't working.

I suspect that some of my readers may wish to add or amend hypotheses--I invite input.

I choose to test the final hypothesis--went out today and bought some real candle wicks at a hobby shop. I realize that some of my more scientifically minded readers (my research physicist brother, in particular) will object to changing a parameter in mid-experiment--but we want a milk-fed (okay, sugar fed!) pumpkin, dammit!

Stay tuned to next week.

First Data

September 2, 2006

Milk-Fed Pumpkin "A": 22" L/ 47" D
Milk-Fed Pumpkin "L": 13" L/ 27" D
Non-Milk-Fed-Pumpkin: 18" L/ 38" D

In one week, "A" has grown 3" in Length and 11" in Diameter.
"L" has grown 4" in Length and 10" in Diameter.
Non has grown 7" in Length and 16" in Diameter.



It is starting to look like milk-fed pumpkins are more "myth" than "fact" indeed.

Big Sister is in despair at the thought that another pumpkin is growing faster than hers, but clinging to the "fact" that hers is still biggest.

We will seek explanations for this phenomenon if it continues another week.

The Experiment Begins

We had a pumpkin. Close inspection revealed that we had not just one, but three. One rather large one, and two smaller ones.

All larger than Almanzo's when he began, but let's remember, he was "Farmer Boy." We're just garden-diddlers out here in the 'burbs of Northwest Indiana.

If we were going to grow a milk-fed pumpkin, we had no time to lose.

First, a quick check with the source:

"Father had shown him how to raise a milk-fed pumpkin. They had picked out the best vine in the field, and snipped off all the branches but one. Then between the root and the wee green pumpkin they carefully made a little slit on the underside of the vine. Under the slit Almanzo made a hollow in the ground and set a bowl of milk in it. Then he put a candle wick in the milk, and the end of the candle wick he put carefully into the slit.

Every day the pumpkin vine drank up the bowlful of milk, through the candle wick, and the pumpkin was growing enormously. Already it was three times as big as any other pumpkin in the field" (Wilder, *Farmer Boy*, 191-2).

Okay, there are a number of problems with these instructions:

1) our pumpkin is not a "wee green" thing but already a good 30" in diameter.
2) if you've ever grown pumpkins (this was my first time) the task of "snipping off all the branches but one" is rather formidable: we have an enormous tangle of very SPINY vines in our bed, & figuring out which branch belongs to which vine will take more time and energy than this full-time-employed mom will ever have.
3) we are organic, and I'll be damned if I'm going to feed a pumpkin milk that costs $8.20/ gallon (more than any other liquid we consume, including both gas and liquour!)
4) who the hell has candle wicks lying around the house these days? (yeah, probably all you scrapbookers out there...)

Fortunately, we have something Manley didn't--the internet(s). Taking instant advantage of our newly installed high speed internet connection (WIRELESS, no less!) I quickly find both a solution to some of these problems and--a challenge.

From www.oldhouseweb.com/gardening:
"Gardeners occasionally try to grow giant pumpkins using the "milk-fed" method. This technique is an old-time favorite (probably more myth than fact) which can be tried. Pick out the healthiest vine in the garden, trim off all side shoots. Let one pumpkin form to softball size, and trim off all other flowers. Cut into the vine with a knife about 3 inches down from the fruit. Do not cut through to the other side of the vine. Insert a candlewick, at least 1/4 inch into the vine, through the slit. Place a bowl of milk or sugar water in a depression beside the pumpkin. Place the other end of the wick into the bowl. Fill the bowl with milk or 1 cup of water mixed with 1 Tablespoon sugar. Cover the bowl with plastic to keep out bugs and dirt. Check it everyday. Make sure the milk does not go sour or the wick fall out of the vine. Refill liquid when it is gone. Keep feeding the fruit this way until harvest. It should be gigantic!"

Probably more myth than fact, eh? Well, we're going to settle that question once and for all!!

We decide not to worry about initial size (softball, schmoftball); choose the sugar water method (thank you, internet!); use plastic sour cream containers with a little hole in the lid (both Big Sister and Little Sister are squeamish about bugs); and, in lieu of candle wicks, we do some quick experimenting on the wicking ability of several different strips of cloth until we find what seems to be a suitable alternative.

August 26, 2006: the experiment begins. Each little girl has a milk-fed pumpkin, and there is one "control." Since the pumpkins are all different sizes when we start, rate of growth rather than final size will have to be the determinant of whether or not the milk-fed method is "more myth than fact."

I'll let my more scientifically-oriented readers (that would be you, Eric) critique our methodology.

Here is our initial data: (L=Length; D=Diameter; I realize W=Weight is a usual measure of pumpkin growth and size, but we don't own a scale...)

Milk-Fed Pumpkin "A": 19" L/ 36" D
Milk-Fed Pumpkin "L": 9" L/ 17" D
Non-Milk-Fed-Pumpkin: 11" L/ 22" D

If I can figure out a way to a) make and then b) upload a chart to this blog, you'll be seeing rate of growth charts in the next couple of postings....

In the beginning was the Word...

Last summer when we were all in Germany and ran out of English books for Big Sister to read, she received a gift of the entire Laura Ingalls Wilder series from our friend and landlady Claudia (whose daughter had been an exchange student in the US many years ago, and had, in turn, received the boxed set from her host family...). Those of you familiar with this series may recall that as a child Laura's husband Almanzo (aka Manley) won first prize at the county fair by growing a "milk-fed pumpkin."

Something about this captivated her six-year old imagination: Big Sister became obsessed with the idea of growing a milk-fed pumpkin. So: last year, at Halloween, she collected seeds from the (purchased) jack-o-lantern pumpkin, put them in an envelope, labeled them, and tucked them away. Over the winter, the entire Little House series was re-read, and plans for the pumpkin were dreamed and, in that six-going-on-seven-way, incessantly chattered about. There was no getting out of this one: we were growing a milk-fed pumpkin this year, come hell or high water.

June 2006, we planted pumpkin seeds in little jiffy pots. They sprouted and grew. Late June, we planted 4 pumpkin plants in our spare expanse of mulch. The plants took off. Leaves the size of elephant ears. Flowers galore! But....no fruit. Those of us who had been around the block longer than 7 years began to suspect that we had planted hybrid--that is, sterile--seeds. We explained this to Big Sister, and she gamely accepted the disappointment of having to wait another year to fulfill her dream. But hope springs eternal in this young girl's breast, and despite my insistence that no pumpkins would be forthcoming this year, she continued to check her patch.

And suddenly, at the end of August, a minor miracle...